Absolutely, yes. Understandably, many people are concerned about irregularities or vulnerabilities in voting machines as we approach the 2026 U.S. elections. There are several ongoing issues and risks—some are being addressed, while others still require attention. I’ll share my thoughts about what I researched and found, discuss the risks, outline the steps being taken, and highlight what still needs our attention.
Current Status of State Voting Machines
1. Aging Equipment
· Many voting machines in the U.S. are old — often over 10 years old, in some cases even older — and have surpassed their expected lifespan. Older machines tend to be more difficult to maintain (spare parts may no longer be available), more prone to breakdowns, and often run outdated software that may not receive security updates. ([Brennan Center for Justice][1])
2. Security Vulnerabilities & Software Threats
· There have been documented reports of attempts to access copies of voting system software illegally. A letter from computer scientists expressed concerns that these breaches could pose significant risks to election security. ([Colorado Public Radio][2])
· Some machines come equipped with features such as wireless connectivity or older, unsupported operating systems. While these can offer convenience, they may also increase the risk of security vulnerabilities. ([Brennan Center for Justice][3])
· Even when vulnerabilities are identified, such as with Dominion systems, investigations—including those by Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)—have not uncovered any evidence that these flaws were exploited in significant national elections in the past. However, their presence still highlights a potential risk. ([The Washington Post][4])
3. Human Error & Operational Issues
· Sometimes irregularities are less about malicious hacking and more about mechanical failures, calibration errors (e.g., touchscreens mis-registering selections), mis-scanning, delays, or mismanagement. These may not change outcomes, but can harm confidence and create logistical headaches. ([Brennan Center for Justice][3])
4. Disinformation & Trust Erosion
· Even if there's no clear evidence of large-scale manipulation, it's important to acknowledge that suspicion, claims of fraud, and distrust can still be quite significant. Sometimes, even small irregularities can be amplified through social media and political discussions, making them appear more significant than they actually are. ([AP News][5])
What Is Being Done?
· Some jurisdictions are replacing obsolete machines or planning upgrades. ([Brennan Center for Justice][6])
· There are calls from experts to mandate more uniform security standards, require post-election audits, improve paper trail verifiability, etc. ([Center for American Progress][7])
· There is increased scrutiny by federal agencies (like CISA) and state/local election officials for vulnerabilities and risk mitigation. ([Brennan Center for Justice][8])
All are dependent on who is holding the power in the current government.
What Are the Risks? What Remains to Be Solved?
1. Funding & resources
· Upgrading machines and putting in stronger security and audit systems does require some investment. Often, local jurisdictions struggle to allocate sufficient funds for these improvements. Additionally, there's sometimes confusion about whether the state, federal government, or local authorities should cover the costs. ([Brennan Center for Justice][9])
2. Uniform standards and oversight
· Security and audit protocols can vary significantly from state to state and county to county. Some areas might not have robust post-election auditing or transparency measures in place. ([Brennan Center for Justice][6])
3. Maintaining the Voters’ Trust
· Even if machines are technically secure, it's important to remember that public perception truly matters. Minor errors, glitches, or delays in counting can create doubts, especially in close races. That's why staying transparent and dependable is so essential.
4. Emerging Threats
· As technology continues to evolve, so does our vulnerability. Concerns include machine learning, supply chain attacks, and insider threats. Exciting new research, such as the application of adversarial machine learning to tabulators, highlights how even minor vulnerabilities can, under specific circumstances, significantly impact outcomes. ([arXiv][10])
Ensuring the integrity of election results is vital to supporting our democracy. Even infrequent failures or irregularities can have significant political and social consequences, especially in closely contested states. Being proactive and prepared can save us from much higher costs later on when issues arise. Keeping voter confidence strong is essential; even small irregularities or the perception of them can discourage voting or lead to distrust in the process.
[1]: https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/defend-our-elections/election-security/voting-machines-infrastructure"Voting Machines & Infrastructure | Brennan Center for Justice"
[2]: https://www.cpr.org/2023/12/05/voting-experts-warn-of-serious-threats-for-2024-from-election-equipment-software-breaches "Voting experts warn of 'serious threats' for 2024 from election equipment software breaches"
[3]: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/americas-voting-machines-risk "America’s Voting Machines at Risk | Brennan Center for Justice"
[4]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/05/28/dominion-voting-machines-cisa-review "No evidence of exploitation of Dominion voting machine flaws, CISA finds - The Washington Post"
[5]: https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-technology-d6bf92f594343d7a489d40394e56e2a1"EXPLAINER: Threats to US election security grow more complex | AP News"
[6]: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/americas-voting-machines-risk-update "America’s Voting Machines at Risk – An Update | Brennan Center for Justice"
[7]: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/election-infrastructure-vulnerabilities-solutions "Election Infrastructure: Vulnerabilities and Solutions - Center for American Progress"
[8]: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-system-security-and-reliability-risks "Voting System Security and Reliability Risks | Brennan Center for Justice"
[9]: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-machines-risk-2022 "Voting Machines at Risk in 2022 | Brennan Center for Justice"
[10]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14582 "Busting the Paper Ballot: Voting Meets Adversarial Machine Learning"
Here’s a clear and detailed risk assessment for voting-machine irregularities as we approach the 2026 election. This highlights what’s likely, considers worst-case scenarios, identifies the principal vulnerabilities with examples, evaluates their seriousness, and offers practical priorities to minimize risks. I’ve included the key sources supporting these critical points.
While it's essential to stay aware of national issues, the most significant problems tend to be minor glitches, delays, and incidents that can erode trust, rather than central nationwide manipulation. The country has made considerable progress over the past decade, with more than 98% of votes now recorded on paper, though some hurdles persist. These include aging equipment, inconsistent audit standards, limited funding, and the ongoing challenge of disinformation. Additionally, there's concern about the current administration seemingly using the Judicial Branch for its own purposes.
Keep in mind, your vote truly matters. It’s your chance to have a say in shaping your community, your state, and your country. Remember all those who fought, marched, and sacrificed so we could have this right. If long lines, doubts, or distractions come up, don’t let them stop you—your participation makes a difference. When you step into that voting booth, know that you’re not just voting for yourself, but for a better future for everyone. Your vote counts, and your voice is so important!